SAR, Vol 11, No 1, November 1995
EDITORIAL: FREEMAN, COCKBURN AND CO.
A magazine like SAR stands or falls on the quality of its writers - and we must also rely on such writers' loyalty and shared commitment, rather than authors' fees, to keep the texts flowing. What could be more fitting, then, than to start our eleventh year of publication with an overview on the past ten years of Canadian policy-making towards southern Africa by Linda Freeman. For Freeman, as regular readers will know, has been our most reliable author, and perhaps our most widely read and cited one, over the first decade of SAR's existence. Each year she has provided us with an assessment - knowledgeable and well-documented, clear and acerbic - of official Canada's undertakings in the region.
Now, in this her tenth instalment, she presents a magisterial overview of official Canada's record over the past decade, an historical survey that effectively debunks many of the myths that have begun to cluster around that record. But she also concludes on a soberingly contemporary note, underscoring the extent to which the orthodoxies of neo-conservative economics, so prevalent in other policy spheres, also give officialdom license for the most selfish possible reading of Canada's on-going interest in South Africa. Competitiveness, trade and investment, IMF rules: so Ottawa's litany goes, with any direct concern for the fate of the dispossessed in South Africa (or elsewhere, for that matter) increasingly downplayed.
Other key articles in the present issue speak further to the implications of this kind of finding. Please note, however, that Freeman's own work - of which SAR readers (and editors) have been the most immediate and grateful beneficiaries over the years - will soon take on the additional weight and substance of an about-to-be published book (by the University of Toronto Press) entitled Canada and South Africa in the Trudeau and Mulroney Years.
This is the good news: readers will want to keep their eyes open for this volume, a stocking stuffer if ever there was one (although such is the scope of Freeman's undertaking that quite a big stocking will probably be required). The bad news? Freeman's threat that her tenth annual contribution to these pages may well be her last - for she is poised to move on to other work (albeit work that remains southern Africa-focused). Do we hear a sigh of relief from Ottawa's foreign-policy mandarins? Not so fast: don't tell Freeman, but we plan to coax her out of retirement from time to time, precisely to continue her heretofore successful efforts to keep those mandarins a little more honest than they might otherwise be inclined to be!
Meanwhile, the tasks of southern Africa-related political work do continue in Canada, as Sue Sutton finds in her survey in this issue of what's left of the erstwhile anti-apartheid movement in Canada. It's true that the loss of the political focus that apartheid's evil system provided has reduced the salience of South Africa in Canada, and the issues of equitable development and democratic empowerment that remain are less easy to get a bead on for many Canadians. Moreover, as Jim Cason (another author familiar, over the years, to SAR readers) observes of the support movement in the United States, there are difficult dilemmas inherent in Africa-related political work in the present global context.
* * *
It seems safe to say that, in sustaining such efforts, there is no substitute for information about what is actually happening on the ground, in the region itself. So we're pleased to enter our second decade by offering a range of articles, beyond our lead pieces, that provide novel and well-grounded insights on pressing issues that confront southern Africans. Moreover - speaking of authors! - we're particularly honoured in this issue to have, alongside veteran Linda Freeman, a notable first-time SAR contributor: Canada's leading singer-songwriter, Bruce Cockburn.
Other articles probe the current state of play in various spheres of South African policy-making - specifically, sports policy and local government (as analyzed by Douglas Booth and by David McDonald, respectively) - that are also proving to be mine- fields, albeit of a more figurative and immediately political kind. And there is even some good news, in the form of a response by Ken Wilson to an article in a previous issue on post- electoral Mozambique. In striking contrast to the tone and substance of that earlier article, Wilson suggests that there is much that should inspire us in some of the current developments in Mozambique. Could it be that the struggle really does continue, both in southern Africa and in North America? As we enter our second decade of publication we can only make one promise on that front: our writers will keep you posted.
- 30 -
Contents - Vol 11 No 1
"Southern Africa: The North American Front"
Editorial: Freeman, Cockburn and Co. - 1
Canada and South Africa: Less of the Same - 3
by Linda Freeman
The U.S. Front: Newt-ering the Solidarity Movement - 8
by Jim Cason
Canadian Solidarity: After Anti-Apartheid - 10
by Sue Sutton
Timesless Bombs: The Mines of Mozambique - 14
by Bruce Cockburn
The Southern Africa Minefield - 19
by Alex Vines
Decentralization in South Africa: How Democratic? - 23
by David McDonald
South Africa: Elite Sport is Winning - 27
by Douglas Booth
More on Mozambique Now: 1. Not the Whole Story - 30
by Ken Wilson
More on Mozambique Now: 2. Holes in the Story - 32
by Paul Fauvet
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer(s) and not do necessarily reflect the views of the AfricaFiles' editors and network members. They are included in our material as a reflection of a diversity of views and a variety of issues. Material written specifically for AfricaFiles may be edited for length, clarity or inaccuracies.